a post from Mia Carmel’s blog

Filed Under (Uncategorized) by Wenbert on 07-08-2006

Tagged Under : , ,

i had fun reading this… it is more on the ladies’ side… if you are a guy, just convert all the “Guy” words to ‘Women” in you mind while reading it…
1. If a man wants you, nothing can keep him away.
If he doesn’t want you, nothing can make him stay.
2. Stop making excuses for a man and his
behavior.
3. If you have ANY doubt in your mind about a
man’s character, leave him alone.
4. Allow your intuition (or spirit) to save you from
heartache.
5. Stop trying to change yourself for a relationship
that’s not meant to be.
6. Don’t force an attraction.
7. Slower is better.
8. Never live your life for a man before you find what makes you truly
happy.
9. If a relationship ends because the man was not treating you as you
deserve then heck no you can’t “be friends.” A friend wouldn’t mistreat a friend.
10. Have faith in God regarding your relationship, but don’t let faith make you stupid. God does things decent and in order.
11. Don’t settle.
12. If you feel like he is stringing you along, then he probably is.
13. If he keeps changing his mind about the relationship–take that as a BIG sign that he is unstable. Do you really want to be with a man like
that?
14. Don’t stay because you think “it will get better.” You’ll be mad at yourself a year later for staying when things are not better.
15. Honorable men take care of their business
and aren’t involved in a whole lot of mess.
16. The only person you can control in a relationship is you.
17. There’s only one ‘reason’ a man dumps you; he doesn’t want you.
18. Avoid men who’ve got a bunch of children by a bunch of different
women. He didn’t marry them when he got them pregnant, why would he treat you any differently?
19. You really do have to kiss a few frogs before finding the prince.
20. Always put yourself and your happiness first.
21. Always have your own set of friends separate from his.
22. Maintain boundaries in how a guy treats you. If something bothers you, speak up.
23. Like from the show Sex and the City, if he doesn’t call, he just isn’t
that interested.
24. Be honest and upfront.
25. Know when to cut the cord, don’t be strung along.
26. Don’t fall for the “I’m confused role”. Remove yourself from the
situation to let him figure things out (but don’t wait for him, move on).
27. If you want to have a clue as to how he will treat you, watch how he treats the WOMEN in his family (not just mom).
28. There’s more than physical abuse, there’s emotional and mental abuse. If he causes any of them…flee.
29. You cannot change a man’s behaviors. Change comes from within.
30. Don’t let him place rules on you that he is not willing to follow
himself — double-standard.
31. Don’t EVER make him feel he is more important than you are…even if he has more education or in a better job.
32. Do not make him into a quasi-god. He is a man, nothing more nothing less.
33. Demand respect and if he can’t give it, he can’t have you!
34. Don’t compete with other woman, but be aware that men are attracted to what they see.
35. If you think he is cheating, he probably is. Confront him right away
and if you feel he’s lying, let him go.
36. Actions speak louder than words.
37. Never let a man define who you are.
38. Never rely on a man for compliments, look to yourself for that.
39. Never borrow someone else’s man.
40. If he cheated with you, he’ll cheat on you.
41. Just because he says he loves you, doesn’t mean that he won’t hurt you and it doesn’t mean that you are meant to be with him.
42. To use painful hard-won wisdom — ‘get it right’ the next time.
43. Know that you deserve to be the number one person in the life of the No.1 person in your life.
44. Love is a verb …
45. Learn to give up your lifelong task of trying to make someone
unavailable-available, someone ungiving-giving, and someone unloving-loving.
46. A man will only treat you the way you ALLOW him to treat you.
47. All men are NOT dogs.
48. You should not be the one doing all the bending…compromise is a two way street.
49. If you don’t love self…you can’t love anyone else.
50. You cannot mend someone else’s broken heart.
51. You need time to heal between relationships…there is nothing cute
about baggage…deal with your issues before pursuing a new relationship.
52. You should never look for someone to COMPLETE you…a relationship consists of two WHOLE individuals…look for someone complementary…not supplementary.
53. Dating is fun…even if he doesn’t turn out to be Mr. Right.
54. NEVER give more in a relationship than you are getting out of it.
55. Never become your man’s “therapist”.
56. When actions and words conflict, believe the actions. Respond to the actions.
57. A real healthy relationship requires two people. One person can end
it - but it takes two to make it work.
58. Don’t fall for the “I’m not the loving type”…when a man loves you
there is nothing in this world (within reason) that he wouldn’t do for you.

59. Make him miss you sometimes…when a man always know where you are, and you’re always readily available to him he takes it for granted.
60. Give him his space…let him go out with his boys, don’t pressure him to spend time with you, You cant force a man to hang out with you.
61. If you wouldn’t allow your daughter to be with him you shouldn’t.
62. Never let a man know everything. He will use it against you later.
63. Never move into his mother’s house.
64. Provide financially for yourself and don’t depend on anyone.
65. Never co-sign for a man.
66. Never believe you have the perfect guy and he is so innocent.
67. Never spoil your man; let him spoil you.
68. Never let a man mess up your credit.
69. When it’s time to let go; let go.
70. Good men should be treated like good men.
71. Don’t play games.
72. Don’t fully commit to a man who doesn’t give you everything that you need.
73. Keep him in your radar but get to know others.
74. Compatibility in terms of educational attainment, values, beliefs,
personal and career goals, and socioeconomic status, are important.

75. Never date a guy who wears color contact lens.

R Kelly sex video to be shown

Filed Under (Uncategorized) by Wenbert on 10-06-2006

Tagged Under : ,

The video which has R Kelly and a 13-nish year old year having sex will be shown to the court, the public and the media.

They say it is too explicit. But who cares?

Liquid Condom made in China

Filed Under (Uncategorized) by Wenbert on 02-06-2006

Tagged Under : ,

This is old news but it grabbed my attention and I could not resist posting it here.liquidcondom.jpg

The name itself scares me: “Nanometer-silver Cryptomorphic Condom“. I myself would not want my woman to be putting products that are made in China in/on her :P. I wonder if women in the Guangdong Province (bird flu?) are willing to try it out. (Click the photo to enlarge it.)

Maybe it is some sort of experimental product released in China for testing and the Chinese women are the guinea pigs. They say it forms a barrier-like foam inside the vagina, is anti-bacterial and has a lubricating effect. I say they should try it out on monkeys first before they use it in women all over mainland China! (OMG! If you were a woman, would you want foam inside your vagina?)

If you have used this, I would like to read your review on the product. Comments anyone?
Source.

Mate normally with artificial penis - Rabbits

Filed Under (Uncategorized) by Wenbert on 26-05-2006

Tagged Under : ,

According to the New Scientist, researchers have successfully created an artificial penis that allows rabbits with damaged penis to successfully mate.

Imagine the application of this to human beings.

The British know their women well…

Filed Under (Uncategorized) by Wenbert on 28-04-2006

Tagged Under :

LONDON (Reuters) - British actress Keira Knightley was voted the world’s sexiest woman in a magazine poll on Thursday, beating model Keeley Hazel and Hollywood star Scarlett Johansson into second and third place respectively.

The poll, which British magazine FHM said was based on two million votes, saw homegrown model and TV presenter Kelly Brook slip to 5th from first last year, while Angelina Jolie, expecting a baby in mid-May, came fourth.

Beyonce Knowles was the sexiest pop star at number seven and Russian tennis player Maria Sharapova the top sportswoman at number 56.

FHM said the poll was the only one of its kind voted for entirely by the British public.

I would have voted for her too ;)

Why Women Have Breasts

Filed Under (Uncategorized) by Wenbert on 20-04-2006

Tagged Under :

I found this on torrentspy.com, and went on to the source to read it.

Many people may suppose that the question of the title is a stupid one, given that the answer is so obvious: women have breasts for feeding babies. In fact, the question is a good one, because it is a mystery why the vast majority of women has breasts. Most women are, at this moment, not lactating, and yet they have breasts. If breasts were merely for feeding babies, then most women would not have them. They would develop them only during pregnancy, and would lose them again when they stopped breast-feeding. Humans are unique in the animal world, in that they develop breasts at puberty and retain them into old age, whether or not they ever get pregnant. This requires an explanation.

A heifer develops an udder when it is time to produce milk for feeding her calf. Once the calf has stopped feeding, the heifer (now a “cow”) dries up and the udder disappears. Growing an udder, like any body tissue, is a cost. It takes nutrients to grow and maintain the udder, and the udder itself is a hindrance to quick movement. Indeed, prominent udders are not necessarily needed at all. Seals manage to feed milk to their young without any such protuberances which would spoil their hydrodynamic form. A woman pays a cost in nutrition and agility by growing breasts when she doesn’t need them. If there is a cost, then there must be a benefit to explain why this human trait has evolved. Given that the trait is unique to humans, it is very likely indeed that the explanation will be found in some other characteristic that is unique to humans.

There is surprisingly little literature on this topic. There are a few short papers, many written long ago, and most of which have been soundly criticised by more recent writers. There is little point in repeating the demolition of several early theories here. See the bibliography for further reading (Cant 1981 especially).

Herbivorous women, carnivorous men

Our ancestors were hunters, who survived principally from eating other animals. With other hunter species, like dogs, cats, and stoats, the adult females hunt, unless perhaps they are heavily pregnant or tending young offspring. Hunting is difficult enough without udders, and so the hampering effect of udders is minimised - they only grow them when lactating. Herbivorous herd beasts like cows, sheep, and deer must be able to escape predators by running faster than their neighbours in the herd, and so one with useless udders is just asking to be eaten. Most mammals rely on speed to escape being eaten, so even solitary herbivores would be badly advised to grow udders until the proper time.

Humans, however, are importantly different, in that they do not rely mainly on speed to escape predation. Few animals will attack a group of humans, and humans will use group tactics, fire, weapons, missiles, and the like to defend themselves. Any animal powerful enough to bring down an animal as big as a grown woman, can out-run her so easily that speed of foot is not the issue. Human females gather food in groups, and in parts of the world where this is dangerous, tribes post armed teenage boys, and the occasional older man, to guard them. Much of their time they spend in camps, in the presence of fire, and very few animals will venture there. Human females, therefore, paid a much smaller price for developing udders than other animals, during their evolution. Very few women in the Pleistocene of child-bearing age would have been lost to predators. They were free to be hampered by non-lactating breasts.

In other words, division of labour made nulliparous breasts possible. Our ancestral fathers behaved like carnivores, and needed to be able to run and jump freely to hunt, and our ancestral mothers behaved more like herbivores, harvesting in groups. A nullipara is a female who has not yet borne children. It is an interesting quirk of our culture that we all know the word virgin, but few know nullipara.

The above explains how it could have been possible for non-lactating breasts to evolve, but it still falls a long way short of saying why they actually did evolve.

Beautiful plumage, beautiful breasts?

Once it has been established that it is possible for breasts to evolve, then an evolutionary scientist can argue that breasts can evolve as sexual characteristics. They could be like peacocks’ tails – arbitrary signals to the opposite sex. Peacock tails are big, fan-shaped and green, with lots of “eye-spots”. Other birds have long tapering tails or bright red plumage. It seems that it doesn’t really matter what sort of plumage evolves, as long as it belongs recognisably to a certain species, and as long as the opposite sex develops a preference for it. Once peahens start finding fan-shaped green tails with spots sexy, then it is in their interests to mate with the male with the best tail of that description. Human breasts could have evolved in the same arbitrary way. This can lead to “Fisherian run-away selection” which very rapidly causes a species to evolve such things as bright plumage, wattles and combs, and, perhaps, breasts. Fisher’s logic would say that once men start to find breasts attractive, women have selective pressure on them to grow them, and thus do such women become sexier, and thus is there a greater pressure on men to find them sexy.

The classic Fisherian example is the peacock’s tail, and I apologise to evolutionists who have read about this too many times already. In peacocks, however, the males are the pretty ones. In humans, somehow this is reversed: women are the pretty ones, and men are all astonishingly ugly. In most species, the females are the replicators, and must be sensible about camouflage and the like, and so can’t afford to be showy, but even if most of the males die because of their hampering plumage, this doesn’t matter, since those left can fertilise all the females, and will probably have the best genes anyway, since they managed to survive. This occurs in its most extreme form in species where the males play little or no part in the rearing of offspring. Humans have fairly high male parental investment, however, and so the males are more valuable, and as said before, mortality due to predation in adult females, even those hampered by udders, would be so low, that this rule could in humans be sex-reversed.

That breasts were selected for by sexual selection is convincingly argued by Geoffrey Miller in his book The Mating Mind (2000). Like other such traits, they exaggerate the different between the sexes; they are invisible on the skeleton; they vary greatly between individuals; they enlarge after puberty; they engorge with blood during sexual arousal; all cultures value them as sexual symbols and many mutilate them for sexual offences; all around the world they are emphasised to look sexy or played down to avoid sexual attention. That breasts vary so much in size is a good clue to their not being utilitarian like hands or eyes. Pre-lactating breasts consist mainly of fat. Lactating breasts produce the most milk about eight months after the start of lactation. During the first eight months of lactation, however, the breasts are at their largest. It seems that the fat is actually hampering to milk production, and that it takes eight months to change the design of the breast to maximise efficiency, and get rid of the decorative fat.

A peacock’s tail seems to have some innate qualities of beauty, in that humans find them beautiful, and they were not designed for us to gaze upon. A human breast involves a circle within a circle within a circle, all presented to the viewer. It is easy to imagine that there might be some innate beauty in this design. The nipple is not placed for efficient feeding. When tapping a barrel, one does not put the tap half way up the barrel. A much more efficient nipple would be on the bottom of the breast. This would be better for getting milk to (gravity feed) and easier for the infant to suckle from. One possible explanation for the location of the nipple is that it accentuates pertness when it points upward, and hides sagginess, in that it almost never points directly downward (see below for why this might be important). Another is that the geometric perfection of the design allows the viewer to see the tiniest of imperfections. The eye can detect very easily whether a circle is properly circular or not, and whether a circle within it is exactly at the centre. If a breast’s form is for display, then its design might be expected to be something which is particularly difficult to get just right.

Breasts, when not lactating, have an important decorative function.  

Full Story is here ;)

Subscribe to Rss Feed : Rss